[Neil]

Hi,
Does Office 97 (pro version) install and run under XP?

[Mike Hall \(MS-MVP\)]

Yes, Neil, it does..

--
Mike Hall
MVP - Windows Shell/User

"If hard work were such a wonderful thing, surely the rich would have kept
it all to themselves." - Lane Kirkland


"Neil" <n_hinton@FISHonetel.com> wrote in message
news:42b4b3b8@212.67.96.135...
> Hi,
> Does Office 97 (pro version) install and run under XP?
>
>

[Ken Blake]

In news:42b4b3b8@212.67.96.135,
Neil <n_hinton@FISHonetel.com> typed:

> Does Office 97 (pro version) install and run under XP?


Yes.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup

[KrazE]

It does, but it looks like a crappy dinosaur out of place in the new digs.
I'd upgrade mine, but I use it so infrequently & I don't need more functions
than I can do in Excel as it is....... but it's an eyesore for sure

--
~*Kim*~

MCP/MCSA/MCSE
The Canadian DOS Prompt: EH?\>



"Neil" <n_hinton@FISHonetel.com> wrote in message
news:42b4b3b8@212.67.96.135...
> Hi,
> Does Office 97 (pro version) install and run under XP?
>
>

[Neil]

Many thanks for the replies.

Neil

[John Herbster]

"Mike Hall (MS-MVP)" <mike.hall.mail@sympatico.ca> wrote
> "If hard work were such a wonderful thing, surely the rich
> would have kept it all to themselves." - Lane Kirkland

It is because I think that hard work *is* such a wonderful
thing, that I do my best to encourage others to share in it!

--
JohnH
(Help stamp out stupidity and ignorance, with civility;
but, slap down outright lies.)

[PopS]

What? That's the silliest reason I've ever read for
upgrading; you have a distorted view of usage.
Besides, maybe the OP's like me and for valid reasons,
needs BOTH 97 and a later version of Word. WD97 has 3
very specific and unique capabilities that were lost in
2000 and forward.

Word97 is faster, more efficient, produces smaller
files, etc.. If it does all one needs, there is no
reason to upgrade it. Version, like the app itself, is
a personal preference and need.



"KrazE" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:u7p%23C2GdFHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> It does, but it looks like a crappy dinosaur out of
> place in the new digs. I'd upgrade mine, but I use it
> so infrequently & I don't need more functions than I
> can do in Excel as it is....... but it's an eyesore
> for sure
>
> --
> ~*Kim*~
>
> MCP/MCSA/MCSE
> The Canadian DOS Prompt: EH?\>
>
>
>
> "Neil" <n_hinton@FISHonetel.com> wrote in message
> news:42b4b3b8@212.67.96.135...
>> Hi,
>> Does Office 97 (pro version) install and run under
>> XP?
>>
>>
>
>

[Mike Hall \(MS-MVP\)]

KrazE

I use XP in full classic mode, so the older application look works for me..
if an application is only judged by its appearance, I would suggest that the
user of the application has little idea on how to get the best out of it..

--
Mike Hall
MVP - Windows Shell/User

"If hard work were such a wonderful thing, surely the rich would have kept
it all to themselves." - Lane Kirkland


"KrazE" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:u7p%23C2GdFHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> It does, but it looks like a crappy dinosaur out of place in the new digs.
> I'd upgrade mine, but I use it so infrequently & I don't need more
> functions than I can do in Excel as it is....... but it's an eyesore for
> sure
>
> --
> ~*Kim*~
>
> MCP/MCSA/MCSE
> The Canadian DOS Prompt: EH?\>
>
>
>
> "Neil" <n_hinton@FISHonetel.com> wrote in message
> news:42b4b3b8@212.67.96.135...
>> Hi,
>> Does Office 97 (pro version) install and run under XP?
>>
>>
>
>

[Jeff Needle]

I agree. I use Word97 almost exclusively. I tried Word2000 but it felt
like I'd put on 100 lbs. of excess weight.

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:19:18 -0700, PopS <nobody@devnull.spamcop.net>
wrote:

> What? That's the silliest reason I've ever read for
> upgrading; you have a distorted view of usage.
> Besides, maybe the OP's like me and for valid reasons,
> needs BOTH 97 and a later version of Word. WD97 has 3
> very specific and unique capabilities that were lost in
> 2000 and forward.
>
> Word97 is faster, more efficient, produces smaller
> files, etc.. If it does all one needs, there is no
> reason to upgrade it. Version, like the app itself, is
> a personal preference and need.
>
>
>
> "KrazE" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:u7p%23C2GdFHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> It does, but it looks like a crappy dinosaur out of
>> place in the new digs. I'd upgrade mine, but I use it
>> so infrequently & I don't need more functions than I
>> can do in Excel as it is....... but it's an eyesore
>> for sure
>>
>> --
>> ~*Kim*~
>>
>> MCP/MCSA/MCSE
>> The Canadian DOS Prompt: EH?\>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Neil" <n_hinton@FISHonetel.com> wrote in message
>> news:42b4b3b8@212.67.96.135...
>>> Hi,
>>> Does Office 97 (pro version) install and run under
>>> XP?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



--
------------------------------
Jeffrey Needle
jeff.needle@general-net.com
jeff.needle@hotpop.com