Bootvis Driver delay not traced



Rich Bell
07-10-2005, 02:03 AM
When I trace "Next Boot + Driver Delays" the "Driver Delay" data is not
captured. The Process Creates data is captured. Any ideas why? This used to
work several months ago. I have built a new system with an AMD64 3400+
processor since the last time I ran Bootvis. Is there a problem with a 64
bit chip and Bootvis?

Richard Urban
07-10-2005, 02:03 AM
You will not find bootvis under general Microsoft downloads anymore because
there WERE problems that surfaced after SP1. It is not a supported or
updated application (to the best of my knowledge). That being said, some
still use it without any indication of trouble. Unfortunately, I also am not
one of them!

--
Regards,

Richard Urban

aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)

If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!


"Rich Bell" <rg_bell@nvbell.net> wrote in message
news:uEcooWaXFHA.1148@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> When I trace "Next Boot + Driver Delays" the "Driver Delay" data is not
> captured. The Process Creates data is captured. Any ideas why? This used
> to work several months ago. I have built a new system with an AMD64 3400+
> processor since the last time I ran Bootvis. Is there a problem with a 64
> bit chip and Bootvis?
>

Richard Urban
07-10-2005, 02:03 AM
Also see here!
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/sysperf/fastboot/bootvis.mspx

--
Regards,

Richard Urban

aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)

If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!


"Rich Bell" <rg_bell@nvbell.net> wrote in message
news:uEcooWaXFHA.1148@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> When I trace "Next Boot + Driver Delays" the "Driver Delay" data is not
> captured. The Process Creates data is captured. Any ideas why? This used
> to work several months ago. I have built a new system with an AMD64 3400+
> processor since the last time I ran Bootvis. Is there a problem with a 64
> bit chip and Bootvis?
>

Jack
07-10-2005, 02:03 AM
Bootvis has a new version out that works well so far.

"Richard Urban" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OpKDi$$XFHA.2380@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> You will not find bootvis under general Microsoft downloads anymore
> because there WERE problems that surfaced after SP1. It is not a supported
> or updated application (to the best of my knowledge). That being said,
> some still use it without any indication of trouble. Unfortunately, I also
> am not one of them!
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Richard Urban
>
> aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)
>
> If you knew as much as you think you know,
> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
>
>
> "Rich Bell" <rg_bell@nvbell.net> wrote in message
> news:uEcooWaXFHA.1148@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> When I trace "Next Boot + Driver Delays" the "Driver Delay" data is not
>> captured. The Process Creates data is captured. Any ideas why? This used
>> to work several months ago. I have built a new system with an AMD64 3400+
>> processor since the last time I ran Bootvis. Is there a problem with a 64
>> bit chip and Bootvis?
>>
>
>

Richard Urban
07-10-2005, 02:04 AM
If you are not a program developer, and are not capable of recoding your
program to eliminate the startup problems IN your program, the utility is
next to useless!

--
Regards,

Richard Urban

aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)

If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!


"Jack" <Jack@nothome.com> wrote in message
news:%23bmi15yYFHA.2288@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Bootvis has a new version out that works well so far.
>
> "Richard Urban" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OpKDi$$XFHA.2380@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> You will not find bootvis under general Microsoft downloads anymore
>> because there WERE problems that surfaced after SP1. It is not a
>> supported or updated application (to the best of my knowledge). That
>> being said, some still use it without any indication of trouble.
>> Unfortunately, I also am not one of them!
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard Urban
>>
>> aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard :-)
>>
>> If you knew as much as you think you know,
>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
>>
>>
>> "Rich Bell" <rg_bell@nvbell.net> wrote in message
>> news:uEcooWaXFHA.1148@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>> When I trace "Next Boot + Driver Delays" the "Driver Delay" data is not
>>> captured. The Process Creates data is captured. Any ideas why? This
>>> used to work several months ago. I have built a new system with an AMD64
>>> 3400+ processor since the last time I ran Bootvis. Is there a problem
>>> with a 64 bit chip and Bootvis?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Rich Bell
07-10-2005, 02:05 AM
Jack wrote:
> Bootvis has a new version out that works well so far.

Where can I get the new version?


Bootvis Driver delay not traced