[Polaris]

Hi:

I noticed that DHCP renew (ipconfig /renew) takes quite different time on
different machines. What are the factors affecting the DHCP performance on a
machine (XP or Win2K) ? Any articles on this?

Thanks In Advance!
Polaris

[Al Dykes]

In article <ODI41muXFHA.1044@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>,
Polaris <etpolaris@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hi:
>
>I noticed that DHCP renew (ipconfig /renew) takes quite different time on
>different machines. What are the factors affecting the DHCP performance on a
>machine (XP or Win2K) ? Any articles on this?
>
>Thanks In Advance!
>Polaris
>
>


autonegotiation problems. You can go into the properties for the
drivers and nail them to the 100/100/FD/HD settings you think yo show
be able to use. If you then have netowrk problems you've probably got
a wiring problem.


I've experinced "known" autonegotiation problems between a major brand
PCMICA 10/100 enet card and a current model Major Brand enterprise
switch. The solution according to the tech notes was to mail the
interfaces at both ends.






--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m

Don't blame me. I voted for Gore.

[Richard G. Harper]

(Excessive crossposting trimmed)

This could be caused by any number of factors, to name a few:

Network load at the time of the request - busy means slower
Network configuration - dead end routes, multiple hubs/switches in path
Server load - again, busy means slower
Client load - yep, busy means slow
Network problems - bad Ethernet or switch/hub devices causing slowdown

--
Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to.
* My website, such as it is ... http://rgharper.mvps.org/
* HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm


"Polaris" <etpolaris@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ODI41muXFHA.1044@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Hi:
>
> I noticed that DHCP renew (ipconfig /renew) takes quite different time on
> different machines. What are the factors affecting the DHCP performance on
> a machine (XP or Win2K) ? Any articles on this?

[Tanu Mutreja [MSFT]]

In addition to Richard's response:

How many dhcp clients do you have? For large number of DHCP Clients or say
"large DHCP database", following factors may also affect the server-side
performance:

* Disk space where DHCP database is stored.
* Frequency of DHCP database backup.
* Frequency of DHCP database clean-up.

-Tanu Mutreja [MSFT]
--
Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is for
newsgroup purposes only.
"Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote in message
news:e1SXdZwXFHA.3712@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> (Excessive crossposting trimmed)
>
> This could be caused by any number of factors, to name a few:
>
> Network load at the time of the request - busy means slower
> Network configuration - dead end routes, multiple hubs/switches in path
> Server load - again, busy means slower
> Client load - yep, busy means slow
> Network problems - bad Ethernet or switch/hub devices causing slowdown
>
> --
> Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com
> * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
> * for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to.
> * My website, such as it is ... http://rgharper.mvps.org/
> * HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
>
>
> "Polaris" <etpolaris@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ODI41muXFHA.1044@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> Hi:
>>
>> I noticed that DHCP renew (ipconfig /renew) takes quite different time on
>> different machines. What are the factors affecting the DHCP performance
>> on a machine (XP or Win2K) ? Any articles on this?
>
>