[Stephen]

Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a script I want to
attach to a reply, but am hesitant because I figure the MS servers might
block it off and/or people might not like it.

But if it is OK I will go ahead.

[Carey Frisch [MVP]]

Intelligent folks will not open attachments in newsgroups.
Please do not post attachments. Describe your issue in words.

--
Carey Frisch
Microsoft MVP
Windows XP - Shell/User
Microsoft Newsgroups

Get Windows XP Service Pack 2 with Advanced Security Technologies:
http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/protect/windowsxp/choose.mspx

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Stephen" wrote:

| Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a script I want to
| attach to a reply, but am hesitant because I figure the MS servers might
| block it off and/or people might not like it.
|
| But if it is OK I will go ahead.

[David Candy]

Sure, but most morons here won't see it. MS want to own people. Therefore they make accessing these groups as hard as possible and feed people through a web page. The web page doesn't show attachments (or HTML formatting - so it's a waste of effort to post technical information as well as it's unreadable).

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
=================================================
"Stephen" <stephen@online.nospam> wrote in message news:#UXZl8jaFHA.3528@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a script I want to
> attach to a reply, but am hesitant because I figure the MS servers might
> block it off and/or people might not like it.
>
> But if it is OK I will go ahead.
>
>

[Leythos]

In article <#nkDWCkaFHA.3132@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, "David Candy" <.>
says...
> Sure, but most morons here won't see it. MS want to own people. Therefore they make accessing these groups as hard as possible and feed people through a web page. The web page doesn't show attachments (or HTML formatting - so it's a waste of effort to post technical information as well as it's unreadable).

MS Doesn't make anything hard, they provide a Usenet feed that any
competent/reasonable ISP will also provide to you. Posting scripts, as
scripts, is always a bad idea - post the text of the script a plain
text, not html.

Usenet is not a HTML place.

--
--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

[Peter Foldes]

Do *not* attach a finished script. You can write the script into the body of the email and the person that you are replying and sending it to and he can copy and paste it into Notepad and execute it there . But rather than doing it here in this XP newsgroup why not both of you go to a scripting group on the msnews server and do the exchange there. Scripts can be dangerous and it is not advisable to attach. Might mess up somebody's system if they decide to execute it.

But the best thing that you can do is that both of you go over to email and handle it there
--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"Stephen" <stephen@online.nospam> wrote in message news:%23UXZl8jaFHA.3528@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a script I want to
> attach to a reply, but am hesitant because I figure the MS servers might
> block it off and/or people might not like it.
>
> But if it is OK I will go ahead.
>
>

[Bert Kinney]

Hi Stephen,

It's best to upload them to the web and provide a link to it.
Or post the code with instruction on how to paste it to a file and
rename it.

--
Regards,
Bert Kinney MS-MVP Shell/User
http://dts-l.org/

Stephen wrote:
> Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a
> script I want to attach to a reply, but am hesitant
> because I figure the MS servers might block it off and/or
> people might not like it.
>
> But if it is OK I will go ahead.

[Kelly]

Email it to the person in question. BTW, what is the script for?

--

All the Best,
Kelly (MS-MVP)

Troubleshooting Windows XP
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com



"Stephen" <stephen@online.nospam> wrote in message
news:%23UXZl8jaFHA.3528@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a script I want to
> attach to a reply, but am hesitant because I figure the MS servers might
> block it off and/or people might not like it.
>
> But if it is OK I will go ahead.
>
>

[Leythos]

In article <O0CXCJraFHA.3280@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, "David Candy" <.>
says...
> Lie 1
> MS Doesn't make anything hard

When have I suggested that in this thread?

> Lie 2
> Posting scripts, as scripts, is always a bad idea

How can you suggest, if you have a technical bone in your body, that
posting a script in script file format, is not a bad thing, especially
as part of a HTML posted message? Do you not understand how many people
would blindly decode and run it?

> Lie 3 (or actually is a non sequitur as it isn't usenet here)
> Usenet is not a HTML place.

Actually, since it's carried on Usenet, and you can directly connect
using a Usenet client pull from MS, it sure looks like Usenet with a web
front end for those that don't know how to setup a Usenet client.


--
--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

[Leythos]

In article <uo09a19o6p66soeel3ijc0e96bdhrh9rj9@4ax.com>, Lou says...
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 13:11:47 GMT, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:
>
> >In article <O5#RmjlaFHA.584@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl>, kelly@mvps.org
> >says...
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> David has been here since before anyone else here, that I know of, including
> >> Alex and myself. Excluding XP and Win98 and before my time, he was an MVP
> >> and is brilliant in the world of windows. As his grammar may not appease to
> >> most at times, it does not disqualify the real person as being human and
> >> gifted. :o)
> >
> >There is no excuse for his acting in the manner he has in this thread -
> >gifted or not, it's abusive and disrespectful and reminiscent of a
> >childish manner that I see in school kids. There are proper ways to
> >express displeasure with a message or reply, and if he was anything that
> >you say he is/was, he would already know that and may even apologize to
> >the group for it.
> >
> >--
>
> This note from Leythos is precious. He (Leythos) is suggesting David
> apologize for his manner of expressing displeasure.
>
> Might I suggest to you, Leythos; apologize for being what your are. A
> person who advocates:
>
> 1. Treating 5 year olds who commit acts society deems crimes in the
> same manner as adults are treated - lock them up or do away with them.
>
> 2. Treating the insane who commit acts society deems crimes in the
> same manner as adults are treated with one caveat - treat them with
> drugs first, then lock them up or do away with them.
>
> 3. Public hangings in the town square as a means of deterring crime.
>
> I cannot express my opinion of you (Leythos) better than David Candy
> did. You (Leythos) are the excrement of the human race - a piece of
> sh*t.

I see that your methods of making excuses for everyone that does
something wrong, so they don't have to be accountable for it, is working
quite well in the World. Just how many crimes have been reduced by
making excuses and not penalizing the guilty?

--
--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

[David Candy]

1. They were all quotes from your first post.
2. It's the whole point of attaching scripts. See 1 regarding your attitude.
3. I don't use usenet at all. I use a private NNTP server called msnews.microsoft.com.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
=================================================
"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message news:MPG.1d0e611cc56e34169898a9@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> In article <O0CXCJraFHA.3280@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, "David Candy" <.>
> says...
> > Lie 1
> > MS Doesn't make anything hard
>
> When have I suggested that in this thread?
>
> > Lie 2
> > Posting scripts, as scripts, is always a bad idea
>
> How can you suggest, if you have a technical bone in your body, that
> posting a script in script file format, is not a bad thing, especially
> as part of a HTML posted message? Do you not understand how many people
> would blindly decode and run it?
>
> > Lie 3 (or actually is a non sequitur as it isn't usenet here)
> > Usenet is not a HTML place.
>
> Actually, since it's carried on Usenet, and you can directly connect
> using a Usenet client pull from MS, it sure looks like Usenet with a web
> front end for those that don't know how to setup a Usenet client.
>
>
> --
> --
> spam999free@rrohio.com
> remove 999 in order to email me

[Leythos]

In article <Ov$SWfsaFHA.2288@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>, "David Candy" <.>
says...
> 1. They were all quotes from your first post.

Yep, I see where you got it now. Kind of out of context unless you quote
the part I was replying too. The intent of the "doesn't make anything
hard" is that it's as easy as in any other OS, easier than some, and not
harder than any others.

> 2. It's the whole point of attaching scripts. See 1 regarding your attitude.

No attitude, just a fact, sorry if you didn't like the way I stated it,
but you came off (and have since) as a real ass.

> 3. I don't use usenet at all. I use a private NNTP server called msnews.microsoft.com.

That doesn't make sense - DON'T USE USENET, but you use NNTP.... NNTP is
Usenet, it doesn't make a difference were you get the feed from.

At least one MSFT person (John Eddy) has said that MS is using a Usenet
server for this, regardless of how it's being viewed.

--
--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

[David Candy]

John Eddy is wrong. NNTP is a technology. Are you suggesting a server running IIS for a workflow costing thingy is "the web"? No it's just a network app using http.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
=================================================
"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message news:MPG.1d0e66eaed1613199898ac@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> In article <Ov$SWfsaFHA.2288@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>, "David Candy" <.>
> says...
> > 1. They were all quotes from your first post.
>
> Yep, I see where you got it now. Kind of out of context unless you quote
> the part I was replying too. The intent of the "doesn't make anything
> hard" is that it's as easy as in any other OS, easier than some, and not
> harder than any others.
>
> > 2. It's the whole point of attaching scripts. See 1 regarding your attitude.
>
> No attitude, just a fact, sorry if you didn't like the way I stated it,
> but you came off (and have since) as a real ass.
>
> > 3. I don't use usenet at all. I use a private NNTP server called msnews.microsoft.com.
>
> That doesn't make sense - DON'T USE USENET, but you use NNTP.... NNTP is
> Usenet, it doesn't make a difference were you get the feed from.
>
> At least one MSFT person (John Eddy) has said that MS is using a Usenet
> server for this, regardless of how it's being viewed.
>
> --
> --
> spam999free@rrohio.com
> remove 999 in order to email me

[Leythos]

In article <uIiNVvsaFHA.3572@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>, "David Candy" <.>
says...
> John Eddy is wrong. NNTP is a technology. Are you suggesting a server running IIS for a workflow costing thingy is "the web"? No it's just a network app using http.

Are you suggesting that getting articles and participating in the groups
via NNTP means that you are not connecting to a Usenet service?

If so, what exactly are you connecting to that provides a NNTP
connection if not a Usenet server?

--
--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me

[Peter Foldes]

David

Sorry David about the above answer. I should have read it more precisely ..Like I said to Kelly my mind is starting to leave me.

I really enjoy these postings ,it breaks the monopoly . I am now and was laughing at the whole thing and I find it very amusing and I am without saying enjoying all of this plus the Neil UK thread. Kurt at least tells it as he sees it and as it is. Must do this more often (being sarcastic a bit here). Thank you for this lesson which I have forgot over the years in groups.

Now if we could get Tick in here then that would make everything so much more enjoyable. LOL

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"David Candy" <.> wrote in message news:%23nfISOlaFHA.612@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
The ratbags are the scum in this thread. They are spreading their usual lies. Like you most hide their identities.

I've been here longer than any of these pieces of shit.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
=================================================
"Oziebill" <oziebillREMXXXXXXXXXOVE@XXXXXYYYyahoo.com> wrote in message news:eRO1hMlaFHA.3384@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Every country has its share of ratbags - and as you say this is one from
> here.
>
>
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@email.msn.com> wrote in message
> news:%23tBK9hkaFHA.2520@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Actually no. The person is one of your own countryman from NSW
>
> --
> Peter
>
> Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
> Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
>
> "Oziebill" <oziebillREMXXXXXXXXXOVE@XXXXXYYYyahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:OPlJnZkaFHA.3032@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > Sarah????
> >
> >
> > "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> > news:ObvtTRkaFHA.1456@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > You are an idiot. C&nts like you only want drive traffic to your site.
> >
> > 1. You are a grade A moron in thinking that MS has any committment to
> > NNTP.
> > FTP has been killed this year. You don't get it because you are stupid.
> > HTTP
> > allows ownership of the user.
> >
> > 2. You are so silly. F&ckin silly. Where does helpfulness come from. You
> > want people to jump through hoops. Note many people don't get help here
> > because If I can't attach a script then I won't help. Where do you c&nts
> > get
> > off advocating unuseability.
> >
> > 3. How does one post technical data. Ahh, I see, you slimy piece of slut
> > shit, you want to drive traffic to your web site.
> >
> > So what we have here is
> > 1. WRONG INFOMATION. These are binary groups.
> > 2. Decietful infomation to drive traffic to web sites that is IMMORAL.
> > 3. You don't give a toss for anyone here or you wouldn't be advocating
> > lies
> > to promote web site traffic at user expense.
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
> > =================================================
> > "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
> > news:MPG.1d0d820ff5cb742f98989b@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> >> In article <#nkDWCkaFHA.3132@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, "David Candy" <.>
> >> says...
> >> > Sure, but most morons here won't see it. MS want to own people.
> >> > Therefore they make accessing these groups as hard as possible and feed
> >> > people through a web page. The web page doesn't show attachments (or
> >> > HTML formatting - so it's a waste of effort to post technical
> >> > information as well as it's unreadable).
> >>
> >> MS Doesn't make anything hard, they provide a Usenet feed that any
> >> competent/reasonable ISP will also provide to you. Posting scripts, as
> >> scripts, is always a bad idea - post the text of the script a plain
> >> text, not html.
> >>
> >> Usenet is not a HTML place.
> >>
> >> --
> >> --
> >> spam999free@rrohio.com
> >> remove 999 in order to email me
> >
> >
>
>

[kurttrail]

Peter Foldes wrote:
> David
>
> Sorry David about the above answer. I should have read it more
> precisely .Like I said to Kelly my mind is starting to leave me.
>
> I really enjoy these postings ,it breaks the monopoly . I am now and
> was laughing at the whole thing and I find it very amusing and I am
> without saying enjoying all of this plus the Neil UK thread. Kurt at
> least tells it as he sees it and as it is. Must do this more often
> (being sarcastic a bit here). Thank you for this lesson which I have
> forgot over the years in groups.
>
> Now if we could get Tick in here then that would make everything so
> much more enjoyable. LOL

Be careful what you wish for Peter! ;-)

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

[Peter Foldes]

Kurt

Was being a bit sarcastic with that line. But it would have been nice. Thanks Kurt
--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknowuniverse.org> wrote in message news:ueqHgVtaFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>> David
>>
>> Sorry David about the above answer. I should have read it more
>> precisely .Like I said to Kelly my mind is starting to leave me.
>>
>> I really enjoy these postings ,it breaks the monopoly . I am now and
>> was laughing at the whole thing and I find it very amusing and I am
>> without saying enjoying all of this plus the Neil UK thread. Kurt at
>> least tells it as he sees it and as it is. Must do this more often
>> (being sarcastic a bit here). Thank you for this lesson which I have
>> forgot over the years in groups.
>>
>> Now if we could get Tick in here then that would make everything so
>> much more enjoyable. LOL
>
> Be careful what you wish for Peter! ;-)
>
> --
> Peace!
> Kurt
> Self-anointed Moderator
> microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
> http://microscum.com/mscommunity
> "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
> "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
>
>

[Kelly]

<LOL> Where is Sarah when you need her?

--

All the Best,
Kelly (MS-MVP)

Troubleshooting Windows XP
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com



"Peter Foldes" <okf22@email.msn.com> wrote in message
news:%23tMM7TtaFHA.2444@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
David

Sorry David about the above answer. I should have read it more precisely
..Like I said to Kelly my mind is starting to leave me.

I really enjoy these postings ,it breaks the monopoly . I am now and was
laughing at the whole thing and I find it very amusing and I am without
saying enjoying all of this plus the Neil UK thread. Kurt at least tells it
as he sees it and as it is. Must do this more often (being sarcastic a bit
here). Thank you for this lesson which I have forgot over the years in
groups.

Now if we could get Tick in here then that would make everything so much
more enjoyable. LOL

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"David Candy" <.> wrote in message
news:%23nfISOlaFHA.612@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
The ratbags are the scum in this thread. They are spreading their usual
lies. Like you most hide their identities.

I've been here longer than any of these pieces of shit.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
=================================================
"Oziebill" <oziebillREMXXXXXXXXXOVE@XXXXXYYYyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eRO1hMlaFHA.3384@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Every country has its share of ratbags - and as you say this is one from
> here.
>
>
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@email.msn.com> wrote in message
> news:%23tBK9hkaFHA.2520@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Actually no. The person is one of your own countryman from NSW
>
> --
> Peter
>
> Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
> Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
>
> "Oziebill" <oziebillREMXXXXXXXXXOVE@XXXXXYYYyahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:OPlJnZkaFHA.3032@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > Sarah????
> >
> >
> > "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> > news:ObvtTRkaFHA.1456@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > You are an idiot. C&nts like you only want drive traffic to your site.
> >
> > 1. You are a grade A moron in thinking that MS has any committment to
> > NNTP.
> > FTP has been killed this year. You don't get it because you are stupid.
> > HTTP
> > allows ownership of the user.
> >
> > 2. You are so silly. F&ckin silly. Where does helpfulness come from. You
> > want people to jump through hoops. Note many people don't get help here
> > because If I can't attach a script then I won't help. Where do you c&nts
> > get
> > off advocating unuseability.
> >
> > 3. How does one post technical data. Ahh, I see, you slimy piece of slut
> > shit, you want to drive traffic to your web site.
> >
> > So what we have here is
> > 1. WRONG INFOMATION. These are binary groups.
> > 2. Decietful infomation to drive traffic to web sites that is IMMORAL.
> > 3. You don't give a toss for anyone here or you wouldn't be advocating
> > lies
> > to promote web site traffic at user expense.
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
> > =================================================
> > "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
> > news:MPG.1d0d820ff5cb742f98989b@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> >> In article <#nkDWCkaFHA.3132@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, "David Candy" <.>
> >> says...
> >> > Sure, but most morons here won't see it. MS want to own people.
> >> > Therefore they make accessing these groups as hard as possible and
> >> > feed
> >> > people through a web page. The web page doesn't show attachments (or
> >> > HTML formatting - so it's a waste of effort to post technical
> >> > information as well as it's unreadable).
> >>
> >> MS Doesn't make anything hard, they provide a Usenet feed that any
> >> competent/reasonable ISP will also provide to you. Posting scripts, as
> >> scripts, is always a bad idea - post the text of the script a plain
> >> text, not html.
> >>
> >> Usenet is not a HTML place.
> >>
> >> --
> >> --
> >> spam999free@rrohio.com
> >> remove 999 in order to email me
> >
> >
>
>

[Oziebill]

Back spreading bile in the publisher group - thought Kurt had scared her
off!


"Kelly" <kelly@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:ufAra8xaFHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
: <LOL> Where is Sarah when you need her?
:
: --
:
: All the Best,
: Kelly (MS-MVP)
:
: Troubleshooting Windows XP
: http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com
:
:
:
: "Peter Foldes" <okf22@email.msn.com> wrote in message
: news:%23tMM7TtaFHA.2444@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
: David
:
: Sorry David about the above answer. I should have read it more precisely
: .Like I said to Kelly my mind is starting to leave me.
:
: I really enjoy these postings ,it breaks the monopoly . I am now and was
: laughing at the whole thing and I find it very amusing and I am without
: saying enjoying all of this plus the Neil UK thread. Kurt at least tells
it
: as he sees it and as it is. Must do this more often (being sarcastic a bit
: here). Thank you for this lesson which I have forgot over the years in
: groups.
:
: Now if we could get Tick in here then that would make everything so much
: more enjoyable. LOL
:
: --
: Peter
:
: Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
: Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
:
: "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
: news:%23nfISOlaFHA.612@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
: The ratbags are the scum in this thread. They are spreading their usual
: lies. Like you most hide their identities.
:
: I've been here longer than any of these pieces of shit.
:
: --
: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
: =================================================
: "Oziebill" <oziebillREMXXXXXXXXXOVE@XXXXXYYYyahoo.com> wrote in message
: news:eRO1hMlaFHA.3384@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
: > Every country has its share of ratbags - and as you say this is one from
: > here.
: >
: >
: > "Peter Foldes" <okf22@email.msn.com> wrote in message
: > news:%23tBK9hkaFHA.2520@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
: > Actually no. The person is one of your own countryman from NSW
: >
: > --
: > Peter
: >
: > Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
: > Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
: >
: > "Oziebill" <oziebillREMXXXXXXXXXOVE@XXXXXYYYyahoo.com> wrote in message
: > news:OPlJnZkaFHA.3032@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
: > > Sarah????
: > >
: > >
: > > "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
: > > news:ObvtTRkaFHA.1456@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
: > > You are an idiot. C&nts like you only want drive traffic to your site.
: > >
: > > 1. You are a grade A moron in thinking that MS has any committment to
: > > NNTP.
: > > FTP has been killed this year. You don't get it because you are
stupid.
: > > HTTP
: > > allows ownership of the user.
: > >
: > > 2. You are so silly. F&ckin silly. Where does helpfulness come from.
You
: > > want people to jump through hoops. Note many people don't get help
here
: > > because If I can't attach a script then I won't help. Where do you
c&nts
: > > get
: > > off advocating unuseability.
: > >
: > > 3. How does one post technical data. Ahh, I see, you slimy piece of
slut
: > > shit, you want to drive traffic to your web site.
: > >
: > > So what we have here is
: > > 1. WRONG INFOMATION. These are binary groups.
: > > 2. Decietful infomation to drive traffic to web sites that is IMMORAL.
: > > 3. You don't give a toss for anyone here or you wouldn't be advocating
: > > lies
: > > to promote web site traffic at user expense.
: > > --
: >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: > > http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
: > > =================================================
: > > "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
: > > news:MPG.1d0d820ff5cb742f98989b@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
: > >> In article <#nkDWCkaFHA.3132@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>, "David Candy" <.>
: > >> says...
: > >> > Sure, but most morons here won't see it. MS want to own people.
: > >> > Therefore they make accessing these groups as hard as possible and
: > >> > feed
: > >> > people through a web page. The web page doesn't show attachments
(or
: > >> > HTML formatting - so it's a waste of effort to post technical
: > >> > information as well as it's unreadable).
: > >>
: > >> MS Doesn't make anything hard, they provide a Usenet feed that any
: > >> competent/reasonable ISP will also provide to you. Posting scripts,
as
: > >> scripts, is always a bad idea - post the text of the script a plain
: > >> text, not html.
: > >>
: > >> Usenet is not a HTML place.
: > >>
: > >> --
: > >> --
: > >> spam999free@rrohio.com
: > >> remove 999 in order to email me
: > >
: > >
: >
: >
:
:

[kurttrail]

Oziebill wrote:
> Back spreading bile in the publisher group - thought Kurt had scared
> her off!

LOL! I doubt she is scared of anything except her own reflection!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

[Stephen]

Peter Foldes wrote:
> Do *not* attach a finished script. You can write the script into the
> body of the email and the person that you are replying and sending it
> to and he can copy and paste it into Notepad and execute it there .
> But rather than doing it here in this XP newsgroup why not both of
> you go to a scripting group on the msnews server and do the exchange
> there. Scripts can be dangerous and it is not advisable to attach.
> Might mess up somebody's system if they decide to execute it.
>
> But the best thing that you can do is that both of you go over to
> email and handle it there
>
> "Stephen" <stephen@online.nospam> wrote in message
> news:%23UXZl8jaFHA.3528@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a script I
>> want to attach to a reply, but am hesitant because I figure the MS
>> servers might block it off and/or people might not like it.
>>
>> But if it is OK I will go ahead.

Thanks, those are good ways to go about.

[Stephen]

Bert Kinney wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> It's best to upload them to the web and provide a link to it.
>> Or post the code with instruction on how to paste it to a file and
>> rename it.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Bert Kinney MS-MVP Shell/User
>> http://dts-l.org/
>>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a
>>> script I want to attach to a reply, but am hesitant
>>> because I figure the MS servers might block it off and/or
>>> people might not like it.
>>>
>>> But if it is OK I will go ahead.

I'm planning a website to make my tidbits available.

[Stephen]

Carey Frisch [MVP] wrote:
>> Intelligent folks will not open attachments in newsgroups.
>> Please do not post attachments. Describe your issue in words.
>>
>> --
>> Carey Frisch
>> Microsoft MVP
>> Windows XP - Shell/User
>> Microsoft Newsgroups
>>
>> Get Windows XP Service Pack 2 with Advanced Security Technologies:
>> http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/protect/windowsxp/choose.mspx
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> "Stephen" wrote:
>>
>>> Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a script I
>>> want to attach to a reply, but am hesitant because I figure the MS
>>> servers might block it off and/or people might not like it.
>>>
>>> But if it is OK I will go ahead.

In other words, no you do not like the idea of me posting a script!

:)

Thanks for the reply, Carey.

[Stephen]

Kelly wrote:
>> Email it to the person in question. BTW, what is the script for?
>>
>> --
>>
>> All the Best,
>> Kelly (MS-MVP)
>>
>> Troubleshooting Windows XP
>> http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com
>>
>>
>>
>> "Stephen" <stephen@online.nospam> wrote in message
>> news:%23UXZl8jaFHA.3528@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>> Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a script I
>>> want to attach to a reply, but am hesitant because I figure the MS
>>> servers might block it off and/or people might not like it.
>>>
>>> But if it is OK I will go ahead.

Thanks for the advice. The script is an advance design script that will
enable Windows to perform functions. It is so advanced it will blow out of
the water anything that winscripter.com windowsitpro.com or
kellys-korner-xp.com has to offer.

It will rock the planet.

[David Candy]

Is it really necessary to tell Kelly that you'll blow hers out of the water.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
=================================================
"Stephen" <stephen@online.nospam> wrote in message news:ej66lJ2aFHA.1360@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Kelly wrote:
> >> Email it to the person in question. BTW, what is the script for?
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> All the Best,
> >> Kelly (MS-MVP)
> >>
> >> Troubleshooting Windows XP
> >> http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Stephen" <stephen@online.nospam> wrote in message
> >> news:%23UXZl8jaFHA.3528@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >>> Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a script I
> >>> want to attach to a reply, but am hesitant because I figure the MS
> >>> servers might block it off and/or people might not like it.
> >>>
> >>> But if it is OK I will go ahead.
>
> Thanks for the advice. The script is an advance design script that will
> enable Windows to perform functions. It is so advanced it will blow out of
> the water anything that winscripter.com windowsitpro.com or
> kellys-korner-xp.com has to offer.
>
> It will rock the planet.
>
>

[kurttrail]

David Candy wrote:
> Is it really necessary to tell Kelly that you'll blow hers out of the
> water.

Sure. As long as he wasn't rude about it! LOL!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

[David Candy]

He's a bit of a troublemaker, isn't he. Causing flame wars and insulting people (Kelly of Kelly's Korner) that answer him.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
=================================================
"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknowuniverse.org> wrote in message news:evEUlV2aFHA.3016@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> David Candy wrote:
> > Is it really necessary to tell Kelly that you'll blow hers out of the
> > water.
>
> Sure. As long as he wasn't rude about it! LOL!
>
> --
> Peace!
> Kurt
> Self-anointed Moderator
> microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
> http://microscum.com/mscommunity
> "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
> "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
>
>

[kurttrail]

David Candy wrote:
> He's a bit of a troublemaker, isn't he. Causing flame wars and
> insulting people (Kelly of Kelly's Korner) that answer him.

Yes, he is quite the troublemaker.We should get him to post under a
different name, as a kind of warning to the noobs. Something like
"Troublemaking Stephen." You think Neil would approve?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

[David Candy]

We should ask him?

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
=================================================
"kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknowuniverse.org> wrote in message news:#BVOM02aFHA.3488@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> David Candy wrote:
> > He's a bit of a troublemaker, isn't he. Causing flame wars and
> > insulting people (Kelly of Kelly's Korner) that answer him.
>
> Yes, he is quite the troublemaker.We should get him to post under a
> different name, as a kind of warning to the noobs. Something like
> "Troublemaking Stephen." You think Neil would approve?
>
> --
> Peace!
> Kurt
> Self-anointed Moderator
> microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
> http://microscum.com/mscommunity
> "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
> "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
>
>

[kurttrail]

David Candy wrote:
> We should ask him?

Seems like the old fart ain't around. Maybe he stroked out, after
dealing with me!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

[Don Burnette]

Stephen wrote:
> Kelly wrote:
>>> Email it to the person in question. BTW, what is the script for?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> All the Best,
>>> Kelly (MS-MVP)
>>>
>>> Troubleshooting Windows XP
>>> http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Stephen" <stephen@online.nospam> wrote in message
>>> news:%23UXZl8jaFHA.3528@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>>> Is it OK to attach WSH scripts to reply posts? I have a script I
>>>> want to attach to a reply, but am hesitant because I figure the MS
>>>> servers might block it off and/or people might not like it.
>>>>
>>>> But if it is OK I will go ahead.
>
> Thanks for the advice. The script is an advance design script that
> will enable Windows to perform functions. It is so advanced it will
> blow out of the water anything that winscripter.com windowsitpro.com
> or kellys-korner-xp.com has to offer.
>
> It will rock the planet.


Highly doubtful.



--
Don Burnette

"When you decide something is impossible to do, try to stay out of the
way of the man that's doing it."