Re: Windows XP SP2 16 bit not supported



NoStop
07-09-2005, 11:22 PM
Ron Martell wrote:

> "Alon Ganon" <alon@designtechnologygizmo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>P.S. don't get home edition on anything it's junk! Professional is Safer
>>and more reliable than home trust me we only use Pro versions in
>>InfoMaven.
>
> Balderdash.
>
> There is zero difference in performance or stability between Windows
> XP Home and Windows XP Pro.

Sadly, you are correct. :-(

--

`,,`,,`,,``,,`
Windows is *NOT* a virus. Viruses are small and efficient.
Table of Equivalents (older, but interesting):
http://linuxshop.ru/linuxbegin/win-lin-soft-en/table.shtml

Ron Martell
07-09-2005, 11:23 PM
NoStop <nostop@stopspam.com> wrote:


>Sadly, you are correct. :-(

Both versions are excellent in terms of stability and performance so I
don't see anything to be sad about. :-)


Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

In memory of a dear friend Alex Nichol MVP
http://aumha.org/alex.htm


Re: Windows XP SP2 16 bit not supported